The art education department makes learning a real world experience

By Elizabeth Gerbush

Silkscreens and still lifes and sculptures, oh my! All one had to was follow the gray cement road to Upton Hall to experience the recent “The Art of Learning” exhibition, a collection of 50 pieces from some of Buffalo State College’s most talented undergraduate and graduate art education students.

The show, which celebrated its 26th year, featured a wide range of artwork, including:
• watercolor paintings
• acrylic paintings
• oil paintings
• charcoal drawings
• ink drawings
• colored pencil drawings
• mixed media pieces
• collages
• silkscreens
• stone sculpture
• clay sculpture
• bronze casting

And the fact that the exhibition was juried meant that the works displayed were among the best of what Buffalo State art education students had to offer.

A juried exhibition is one in which a judge or group of judges select the artworks to be displayed from a number of pieces submitted by exhibit hopefuls. This year, Mary Wyrick, the committee chair of the art education graduate department, chose Gerald Mead, curator of education and outreach at the Burchfield-Penney Art Center, to serve as juror.

The student chapter of The National Art Education Association (NAEA) handled the intake of artwork submitted into the competition. According to Tullis Johnson, the president of NAEA, there were “only about 10 pieces that didn’t get into the show.”

Juried exhibitions give students a taste of what being an artist in the real world is like, as artwork on display in most galleries and museums is usually selected to be there by discriminating art experts.

“Every exhibition in a museum is in a way juried—a curator chooses which works to include and omit,” explained Diane Koeppel, assistant professor in the art education graduate department. “For students, juried exhibitions are more prestigious than exhibitions that showcase class work. These students can now claim that, in this case, a staff member at the Burchfield-Penney Art Center chose their work for inclusion. In my opinion, they are closer to the kind of real world scrutiny that every artist must work with when they enter the world of galleries and museums.”

The students in Koeppel’s Educational Programming in Museums class, AED 604, had just as much a real world experience as the artists: The 16-student class was responsible for the installation of the entire show, and had just one week to complete it, a small time frame for such an undertaking. Under the direction of Koeppel, the students were graded on their creation of a successful gallery exhibit, from painting the walls of the gallery to composing the write-ups about the artists and their works.

“In the classroom they learned about exhibition mathematics (i.e. correct height and spacing), how visitors learn in unstructured learning environments like museums, what visitors expect when they visit museums, and how to develop interactive spaces,” described Koeppel.

"They wrote individual object labels (the text next to the artwork) and chose the wall color. In the gallery, they prepared the walls and painted, designed the space divisions, created the interactive space, chose the placement of each artwork, hung the work, and adjusted the lights. They are also responsible for taking down the exhibition and preparing the artwork for its return to each artist.”

Like Koeppel’s students, gallery-goers were also given the opportunity to take part in “The Art of Learning.” The exhibit featured an interactive corner stocked with art supplies where visitors could create and display their own work of art about the teacher who had the greatest influence on their learning experience. In addition, the corner contained an informational display about the history and design of Upton Hall, also important to the exhibit’s theme because of its onetime status as a revolutionary structure for teaching art.

“When Upton Hall was built, it was state of the art and very innovative in its conceptual design,” explained Koeppel. “Other college and university art departments came to Buffalo State in the ‘60s to examine the building. So, examining the art of architecture—a well thought-out building for the time—seemed like a natural thing.”

The exhibit’s theme also tied into the unique, multi-faceted learning experience necessary to art education students.

“I think it is a great metaphor for the process these students go through to become teachers,” remarked Koeppel. “Unlike students majoring in studio area, these students must become proficient in studio and in art education.”

Koeppel stressed the hard work and careful attention to detail that went into making the exhibit a success.

“I'm very proud of these students,” said Koeppel. “They had a week to put this show up and they did a thoughtful and professional job. I think the positive reaction to this show is because every artist, regardless of age, deserves to have their work displayed in the best light and that's just what we did.”

Elizabeth Gerbush can be reached at gerbet47@buffalostate.edu

Diane Koeppel’s students handled the installation of the entire exhibit.